|
|
Councillor W. J. Williams MBE - Chairman
|
Councillor John Roberts - Vice-Chairman
|
Councillors Mrs. B. Burns MBE, John Byast, W. J.
Chorlton,
|
J. M. Davies, E. G. Davies, P.J.Dunning, J. Arwel
Edwards,
|
C. Ll. Everett, P. M. Fowlie, D. R. Hadley, D.R.Hughes,
Mrs. Fflur M. Hughes, R. Ll. Hughes, W. I. Hughes, G. O. Jones, H.
Eifion Jones, J. Arthur Jones, O. Glyn Jones, A. M. Jones, Eric
Jones, R. Ll. Jones, T. H. Jones, Bryan Owen, R. L.
Owen,
|
G. O. Parry MBE, Bob Parry, OBE, D. A. Lewis
Roberts,
|
G. W. Roberts, OBE, J. Arwel Roberts, W. T.
Roberts,
|
P. S. Rogers, E. Schofield, Hefin W. Thomas, John
Williams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Director (Finance)
|
Corporate Director (Education & Leisure)
|
Corporate Director (Housing & Social
Services)
|
Corporate Director (Environment & Technical
Services)
|
Director of Legal Services / Monitoring Officer
|
Head of Service (Finance)
|
Head of Service (Housing)
|
Solicitor to the Monitoring Officer (RMJ)
|
Committee Services Manager
|
|
|
|
Mr. Alan Morris, Relationship Manager, Welsh Audit
Office.
|
Mr. Gareth Jones, Director,
PricewaterhouseCoopers.
|
|
|
|
Councillors K. Evans, G. Allan Roberts, J. Rowlands, K.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor P. J. Dunning declared an interest in respect
of any item of business on the agenda which might relate to the
employment of his wife in the Education Authority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillors W. J. Chorlton, E. G. Davies, P. M. Fowlie, A.
Morris Jones, J. Arthur Jones, O. Glyn Jones, R. L. Owen and W. J.
Williams, MBE declared an interest in Item 11 of these minutes and
were not present at the meeting during any discussion or voting
thereon. (The Vice-Chair took the Chair for this item).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Eric Jones declared an interest in any matter
that might arise with regard to the Council’s residential
homes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor R. Ll. Jones declared an interest in respect of
any item of business on the agenda which might relate to the
employment of his daughter in the Education Authority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Fflur. M. Hughes declared an interest with
regard to any item of business on the Agenda which might relate to
the employment of her son within the Education
Department.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor C. Ll. Everett declared an interest in respect
of any item of business on the Agenda which might relate to the
employment of his daughter in the Human Resources
Department.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor A.M. Jones declared an interest with regard to
any item of business which might relate to the employment of his
brother in the Education and Leisure Department.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor G. W. Roberts OBE declared an interest in
respect of any item of business which might relate to the
employment of his daughter in the Environmental Services Section.
He also declared an interest with regard to Para 4:5 of the
Treasury Management report (Graigwen, Amlwch) and was not present
at the meeting during any discussion or voting thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
TO RECEIVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM THE CHAIRPERSON,
LEADER, MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE OR THE HEAD OF PAID
SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chair on behalf of Members and Officers expressed his
condolences to Councillor H. Eifion Jones and family upon the loss
of his mother.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He also sympathised with any other Member or member of
staff who had suffered a bereavement. Members and Officers stood in
silent tribute as a mark of their respect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chair extended his congratulations to Aled Myrddin,
whose family lived in Menai Bridge who won Cân i Gymru 2008
recently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Managing Director paid tribute to the Council’s
Children’s Services who had been praised in the Excellence
Wales Awards Ceremony at Cardiff last week. Excellence Wales was a
scheme run annually by the WLGA and Anglesey had received the award
for its citizenship work with children and young people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He also congratulated Anglesey Health Alliance upon being
presented with an award at the Fire Service’s Community
Safety Awards Ceremony for the ‘Sloppy Slippers’
Campaign at Llandudno. The aim of the Campaign was to reduce the
number of accidents and falls in the home by exchanging old
slippers for new ones. This Council led the Alliance’s work
in this respect and Huw Thomas, Principal Environmental Health
Officer and Brian Jones, Older People Strategy Co-ordinator
accepted the award on behalf of the Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On behalf of the Chair, Councillor R. Ll. Hughes, took the
opportunity of paying tribute to the work ethic of Mr. Morgan
Evans, Auctioneer and Estate Agent who had recently been awarded
the MBE in the Queen’s New Year Honours List.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Fflur. M. Hughes on behalf of the members of
staff of the Planning Service expressed her appreciation to the
Corporate Director (Environment & Technical Services) for
replying to the statement made in the Holyhead and Anglesey Mail by
an elected member of this Council with regard to the Scrutiny of
Planning Decisions Panel whose aim was to examine and scrutinise
the action and decision of Planning Officers when determining
planning decisions / appeals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
She stated that the Planning Services staff could carry
their heads high and that the majority of Members supported
them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
RELATIONSHIP MANAGER’S ANNUAL LETTER
2006/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chair extended a warm welcome to those representatives
of the Welsh Audit Office and PricewaterhouseCoopers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported - That the Annual Letter set out the key messages
from work undertaken over the last twelve months up to the point
when it was written by:
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
the Appointed Auditor under the Code of Audit and
Inspection Practice (the Code); and
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
the Relationship Manager on behalf of the Auditor General
for Wales (the Auditor General) under the studies and inspection
powers of the Auditor General.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Annual Letter included a summary of audit and
inspection work and reported progress against improvement actions.
It drew on published reports of other inspectorates to provide an
annual summary of the Council. The work planned for the year was
set out in the Regulatory Plan 2006/2007 and more detail on the
specific aspects of the work undertaken could be found in the
separate reports that had been issued during the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the performance audit and inspection work, the
Auditor General and the Appointed Auditor had concluded that the
Council had adequate performance management arrangements. The
Council had arrangements in 2006/2007 to help it achieve economy,
efficiency and effectiveness in its use of resources, however there
was a scope to improve the medium term financial planning of the
Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
An ESTYN inspection of access and school organisation
rated the Council’s performance as having ‘good
features outweighing shortcomings’ and its prospects for
improving performance as ‘good with no major
barriers’.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Appointed Auditor recommended no statutory inspections
this year. However, the Appointed Auditor and the Auditor General
remained concerned about the impact of member conflict on the
ability of the Council to fulfil the general duty under section
3(1) of the 1999 Act: ‘To
make arrangements to secure continuous improvement in the way in
which its functions are exercised, having regard to combination of
economy, efficiency and effectiveness.’ Whilst they did not consider a statutory inspection was
justified at this stage, they would continue to monitor the
Council’s progress in addressing this issue closely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members were then given a question and answer period on
the contents of the report. Matters raised were:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
rationalisation of schools
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
compliance with waste disposal targets
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
informal meetings of the Executive
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
the good review received following the Joint Review of
Social Services
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
the levels of investment in Information and Communications
Technology
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
comparison of audit and inspection fees with other local
authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chair thanked Mr. Alan Morris and Mr. Gareth Jones for
their presentation and their response to the questions
received.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted and confirmed as a true record, the minutes of
the meeting of the County Council held on 13th December,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
BUDGET, COUNCIL TAX, TREASURY MANAGEMENT AND
PRUDENTIAL
INDICATORS
2008/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 EXECUTIVE'S FINAL BUDGET PROPOSALS
2008-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Portfolio Holder (Finance) - That the
Executive had completed its final budget proposals. The report to
this Council referred to the following matters:-
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The proposed revenue budget for 2008-09 - Table
A
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The proposed Capital budget for 2008-09 with commitments
and indicative items for the period of the capital plan - Table
B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Executive proposed an increase of 1.5% in the Band D
Council Tax. This would take the Band D figure to £766.80.
The Police Authority decided on 15 February on an increase of 4.5%
in its precept. The total paid by Council taxpayers would rise by a
little over 2%, depending on the precept of their Town or Community
Council. The proposed increase was the lowest for ten
years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The revenue budget took account of the final local
government settlement, in which extra “floor” funding
of 2% had been won from the Welsh Assembly Government. The
savings in schools budgets had been limited to 0.3% and an
increased contingency had been set aside for employment
costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The capital plan and budget proposals took account of the
Prudential Code. The capital plan (narrative attached as Appendix)
rolled forward the plan adopted in 2007-08, confirming the priority
given to waste obligations, leisure and regeneration. It included
making a start on Leisure Centre improvements, and a programme to
upgrade Residential Care Homes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As required by the Budget Procedure Rules the following
matters needed to be drawn to the attention of the County Council
prior to them deciding upon the final budget proposals:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The
Council had not adopted a budget strategy;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) The
proposed Council Tax for the year was £766.80 (Band D), an
increase of 1.5%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) A
one-off contribution of £200,000 to be made to the Leisure
Improvements Reserve towards the aim of inviting the Island Games
to Anglesey in 2015. Any staff severance costs in schools
would be met from Education service reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) A
summary of proposed expenditure by service was given in Table A for
the revenue budget and by scheme in Table B for the capital
budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) The
Executive's proposals included :-
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1%
savings across most budgets, totalling £1.2m;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- a package
of corporate savings totalling £0.6m;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision had been made for initial costs of collaboration
on the North Wales Residual Waste Treatment project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) The
Executive had taken account the views of Scrutiny and Overview
Committees reported to it at its meeting of 11 February,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) The
Executive had taken account of responses of external consultees
reported to it at its meeting of 11 February, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) The
main differences between the initial and final proposals of the
Executive were that proposed savings to schools budget had been
reduced from 1% to 0.3%, and that the employment costs contingency
for local government staff had been increased to 2% of the
paybill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) The
Executive would propose to the Council that it should be given
delegated powers to spend budgets and granted powers to vire
budgets, as in previous years, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
powers to spend each budget heading in Tables A and B on
the particular objective, service or project to which it
relates;
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
a limit of nil on virement between budget headings in
Table A;
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
powers to vire from the central contingency, from the
Performance Incentive Grant contingency, or from new or increased
sources of income;
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
powers to vire from the balance of Local Authority
Business Growth Incentive Scheme money towards dealing with Health
and Safety and Fire risk assessments;
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
powers to vire from the leisure improvements reserve in
support of proposals which enhance the leisure service's assets and
strategic sporting facilities. The Executive has not, and
does not intend to, delegate any part of this virement power to
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
powers to transfer budgets between capital projects in
Table B and to commit resources in following years within the
amounts indicated in the Capital Plan and consistent with the
budget framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) The proposals for borrowing and investment
were as detailed in the separate report by the Corporate Director-
Finance on Treasury Management which had been approved by the
Executive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) Other statutory matters were dealt with in the
report by the Corporate Director - Finance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summing up, the Portfolio Holder, expressed his
appreciation to the former Portfolio Holder Councillor John
Roberts, his fellow members of the Executive and the Finance Panel
for their contribution. He also thanked the Corporate Director
(Finance) and his staff for their much valued work in drawing up
the Council budget for 2008/09 and to the Council Departments for
reaching those targets. He proposed that the Council accept the
budget (Items 5.1 - 5.3 of the report to the Council).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor G. O. Parry, MBE referred members to Para 4.5
of the Treasury Management report (Graigwen, Amlwch) in that this
item had not been ratified at the September meeting of the Council
as an audit inquiry was on-going. This item could be approved today
as legitimate expenditure. However, in the Monitoring’s
Officers report at the time, the words ‘unlawful and
illegal’ were included. Since the inquiry had not been
concluded it would be wrong for the Council to approve this item,
it would appear to be unlawful to do so and with serious
consequences for members to ratify this at this stage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The original suggestion was that the expenditure would be
self-financing, no evidence had been provided to support that
proposal. There were members and officers in the Chamber that had
participated in the decision taken by the Executive and he felt
that they should consider their involvement in discussion today. He
proposed that the item be withdrawn and that if a vote was
necessary it should be by means of recorded vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Director (Finance) in reply stated that the
Council was required when adopting its annual budget to confirm the
strategy to control borrowings. Without a strategy the Council
could not move ahead with the regard to control of capital
expenditure, borrowings and investments. The report referred to
this purchase, as it was factual. He asked the Council to approve
the report as a factual record as it was part of the expected
arrangements in adopting a budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor G. O. Parry, MBE requested legal guidance in
this respect and what would be the implications for members of this
Council as regards possible surcharge should the report be ratified
today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Director of Legal Services / Monitoring Officer in
reply stated that there was no risk of surcharge to members of the
Council. It was the Executive’s decision, it was they who
ratified it, so there was no responsibility on other members of the
Council. As the Director of Finance had stated this was no more
than a recognition of an historical fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor A. M. Jones enquired of the Portfolio Holder if
the Executive intended to support those community halls connected
to schools in next year’s budget? Councillor H. Eifion Jones
in reply stated that he would provide Councillor Jones with a
written reply in this respect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 BUDGET 2008-09 - ADOPTION OF FORMAL
RESOLUTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Corporate Director (Finance) - That in
order to adopt its budget for the year 2008-09 and to determine the
level of Council Tax for the year, the County Council
was required to adopt a formal resolution
which dealt in some detail with all connected matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As it considered the Executive’s proposed budget,
the Council should also consider and take account of this report
from the Corporate Director - Finance. This dealt with matters
required under the Local Government Act 2003 (“the
Act”) and the Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local
Authorities (“the Prudential Code”).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Director was required under section 25 (1)
(a) of the Act to report to the Council on the robustness of
estimates made in the course of drawing up the budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was necessarily always the case that uncertainty about
future events affecting the budget meant that estimates needed to
be made, which in turn rested on certain assumptions about what was
likely to happen. The most significant uncertainties affecting the
budget as proposed by the Executive, and the way they had been
dealt with, were :-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Having regard to the foregoing, the Corporate Director was
satisfied that the proposed budget was robustly
estimated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy of Financial Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Director was required under section 25 (1)
(b) of the Act to report to the Council on the adequacy of the
proposed financial reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He had reviewed the level of reserves following an
approach reported to the Executive as part of the budget
preparation process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earmarked reserves had been established to cover known
plans, commitments or risks, and in reviewing the present level of
reserves he had assumed that commitments would be met, plans would
normally be implemented, and risks required a level of provision
commensurate with their amount and likelihood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General revenue balances were currently projected to be
£6.1m at 31 March 2008. This was more than the sum considered
adequate. In his report to the Executive on 8 November 2007, he
contemplated the possibility that the use of reserves would be
necessary to cope with a difficult settlement for 2008-09. However
the floor funding announced in the final settlement was a one-off
reprieve such that the use of reserves was not required in 2008-09.
The medium term strategy outlined to the Executive in February 2008
now envisaged that 2009-10 would be the most difficult year when
drawing on reserves may be required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Having regard to the above he was satisfied that the
Executive’s proposed budget would leave the Council with
adequate financial reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The legislative framework introduced by the Local
Government Act 2003 required the Council to have regard to The
Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities. The
Executive had already affirmed this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary requirements of the Prudential Code were that
authorities should have regard to affordability and
prudence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Executive's budget proposals had regard to
affordability. As always, the capital budget was financed by a
combination of external grants, capital receipts, revenue funds and
borrowing. Anticipated funding from grants was linked to what was
approved or realistically achievable; some spending proposals were
to be included in the capital budget but subject to confirmation of
grants: if the grants were not confirmed, the schemes would fall.
Capital receipts were based on sales made or in progress; amounts
expected but not yet confirmed as definite had been discounted,
with any surplus or shortfall being carried forward to future
years' budgets. Revenue funding was in place, consistent with the
revenue budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Treasury Management report dealt with the
circumstances in which unsupported borrowing was used. The Housing
Stock Business Plan envisaged use of £14m unsupported
borrowing, beyond the period of the three-year Capital
Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The implications of the
proposed budget for external borrowing and investment and the
associated Prudential Indicators were dealt with in the Treasury
Management Report.
|
|
|
|
The Board
of Conservations of Towyn Trewan
|
|
|
|
The Board of Conservators
was a long-established statutory body and charged with the upkeep
of Towyn Trewan common and it had the power to levy or precept on
this Authority’s budget.
|
|
|
|
The Conservators last
issued a levy in 1992-93 for the sum of £1,800. There was no
doubt that the Conservators had the power to issue a levy on this
Council which the Council, once it had received it, was obliged to
pay.
|
|
|
|
Recent correspondence from
the Board of Conservators required a levy of £10,000, for the
general upkeep and management of the Common, clearing ditches,
removing gorse and improving entrances. A meeting was arranged
between the parties in order to understand better their intentions
and to help research the background. The Conservators had not
needed to issue a levy for many years because they had been able to
finance their activities from rents and other income. They had
recently concluded that there was a backlog of work to be done to
discharge their responsibilities, hence the levy. Their
current intentions were to levy a smaller sum in later years once
this backlog of work had been dealt with.
|
|
|
|
The Council had discretion
as to whether to treat items of expenditure in its budget as
general expenses (chargeable to the whole of the county) - or
special expenses (raised from the Council Tax for part of the
county which benefited). Apart from Town and Community Council
precepts, no part of the Council budget had been treated as special
expenses in recent years, which was confirmed annually in the
budget resolution. In local authority taxation generally, special
expenses were very much the exception and it required a very robust
case to discriminate in taxation in this way.
|
|
|
|
In relation to Towyn
Trewan, reasons could be advanced for treating the levy as either
special expenses or as general expenses.
|
|
|
|
Charging the levy of
£10,000 as general expenses was equivalent to adding 34 pence
to a Band D Council Tax for the county. Charging as special
expenses for the communities of Bodedern, Bryngwran,
Llanfair-yn-neubwll and Llanfaelog would add £4.12 to the
Band D Council Tax in those areas.
|
|
|
|
Having regard to the
above, the Corporate Director was of the view that the case for
charging special expenses was not strong enough, especially in the
light of the administrative complications and the precedents. The
decision on special expenses was one that was renewed annually and,
if a much larger sum were to be levied, that may be cause to decide
otherwise. His recommendation for 2008/09 was that it should be
charged as general expenses. The Executive's final budget proposals
took account of the sum, so in practice it did not increase the
proposed Council Tax increase of 1.5%.
|
|
|
|
5.3 TREASURY
MANAGEMENT MATTERS
|
|
|
|
Submitted - A report by
the Corporate Director (Finance) on the information required before
the beginning of a financial year under the Local Government Act
2003, the Guidance on Local Government Investments issued by the
National Assembly for Wales and the Chartered Institute of Public
Finance and Accountancy’s (CIPFA) codes of practice : The
Code Of Practice on Treasury Management in the Public Services and
The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities and
related guidance.
|
|
|
|
At its meeting on 5th
March 2002, the Council adopted a new Treasury Policy Statement and
adopted new clauses regarding Treasury Management as advised by
CIPFA and in preparation for its new Financial Procedure Rules. As
a result, the annual Treasury Management Strategy must be presented
to the Council. This was consistent with the Prudential Code and
with the Local Authorities Executive Arrangements (Functions and
Responsibilities) (Wales) Regulations 2001 which stated that a plan
or strategy for the control of the authority’s borrowing or
capital expenditure should be formulated by the Executive but
adopted by the full Council.
|
|
|
|
Full details were provided
within the report on the following matters:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Treasury Management and Investment
Strategies
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Borrowing Limits and Prudential Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Effect of Amended Regulations of New Statutory
Guidance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor P. M. Fowlie
stated that in view of the fact that there was an on-going
investigation with regard to the purchase of Graigwen, Amlwch (Para
4.5 of Treasury Management report referred) that the Council should
defer consideration of the report today pending the outcome of the
investigation. He was prepared to accept Items 5.1 and 5.2 of the
report (Enclosures B and C).
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Director
(Finance) in response drew members attention to the implications of
not accepting the Treasury Management report. At clause 2 of the
draft resolution on setting the Council Tax, it referred to
Prudential indicators. By adopting these, the Council adopted the
background given in the report. If the Council resolved not to
accept the Treasury Management report, then it would be acting
outside the Code of Practice and maybe outside the law of the land.
It might also stop the capital programme all together until there
was authority to move ahead with Council borrowing. It was
important therefore that the Council moved ahead to adopt the
strategy and to note that money had been set aside to purchase the
property in question.
|
|
|
|
Councillor H. Eifion Jones
(Portfolio Holder) proposed the budget, Council Tax, Treasury
Management and Prudential Indicators Report in its
entirety.
|
|
|
|
Under the provisions of
Council Rule 18.5 it was agreed that a recorded vote be taken on
the matter.
|
|
|
|
For the proposal (i.e to
accept the report):-
|
|
|
|
For:
Councillors Mrs B. Burns, MBE, J. Byast, W. J.
Chorlton, J. M. Davies, J. A .Edwards,
|
|
C. L. Everett, D. R.
Hughes, Fflur. M. Hughes, W. I. Hughes, E. Jones, G. O.
Jones,
|
|
H. E. Jones, J. A .Jones,
R. Ll. Jones, D. L. Roberts, J. A. Roberts, J. Roberts, P. S.
Rogers, W. T. Roberts, H. W. Thomas, J. Williams, W.
J. Williams, MBE.
|
|
|
|
Total = 22
|
|
|
|
Against:
None
|
|
|
|
Abstentions: Councillors E. G. Davies, P. J. Dunning, P. M. Fowlie, R.
Ll. Hughes, A. M. Jones,
|
|
O. Glyn Jones, T. Jones,
B. Owen, R. L. Owen, G. O. Parry, MBE, R. G. Parry,OBE.
|
|
|
|
Total = 11
|
|
|
|
(Note: Councillors E.
Schofield and G. W. Roberts, OBE were not present at the meeting
during the vote).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To confirm the limits shown at Appendix A of the
report for the purposes of the Prudential Code and of Section 3.1
of the Local Government Act 2003 from 1 April, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To approve the Treasury Management Strategy and the
related Investment Strategy for 2008/09.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the debt charges and interests receivable
elements of the revenue budget be noted.
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 COUNCIL RESOLUTION
|
|
|
|
The draft Council
resolution on setting the Council Tax for 2008/09 covered all
matters on which a decision was required arising out of the
Executive’s proposals and this report.
|
|
|
|
1
RESOLVED
|
|
|
|
|
a)
Pursuant to the recommendations of the
Executive Committee to adopt a revenue budget for 2008/09 as shown
in the table at Table A attached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Pursuant to the recommendations of the Executive Committee
to adopt a three year capital plan as shown at Table C.
|
|
|
|
|
c) To adopt a capital budget for 2008/09 with commitments
into following years as
shown at Table
B.
|
|
|
|
|
ch) To
delegate to the Executive Committee for the financial year 2008/09
the powers to transfer budgets between headings as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
i)
unlimited powers to spend each budget heading
in Table A on the particular objective, service or project to which
it relates;
|
|
|
|
ii)
a limit of nil on virement between
budget headings in Table A;
|
|
|
|
iii)
unlimited powers to vire from the central
contingency, from the Performance Incentive Grant contingency, or
from other new or increased sources of income;
|
|
|
|
iv)
powers to vire from the balance of Local
Authority Business Growth Incentive Scheme money towards dealing
with Health and Safety and Fire risk assessments;
|
|
|
|
v)
powers to vire from the leisure improvements
reserve in support of proposals which enhance the leisure service's
assets and strategic sporting facilities.
|
|
|
|
vi)
powers to transfer budgets between capital
projects in Table B and to commit resources in following years
within the amounts indicated in the Capital Plan at Table C and
consistent with the budget framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) To
confirm that items a to ch become part of the Council's budget
framework.
|
|
|
|
|
2
RESOLVED to set the prudential indicators which are estimates for
2008/09 and onwards as shown at Table Ch and to confirm the limits
on borrowing and investments identified as items 10,11 and 14
to 17.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
RESOLVED to adopt and affirm for the purposes of the
financial year 2008/09 the decision of the County Council on 10
March 1998 to set the discount level applicable to the
prescribed Class A and prescribed Class B of dwellings under
Section 12 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 (as amended),
as described by the Council Tax (Prescribed Classes of Dwellings)
(Wales) Regulations 1998, as follows:-
|
|
|
|
Prescribed Class A
Nil Discount
|
|
Prescribed Class B
Nil Discount
|
|
|
|
4
RESOLVED to adopt and affirm for the purposes of the financial year
2008/09 the decision of the County Council on 6 March 2007 to set
the discount level applicable to the prescribed Class C of
dwellings under Section 12 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992
(as amended), as described by the Local Authorities (Calculation of
Tax Base) and Council Tax (Prescribed Classes of Dwellings) (Wales)
(Amendment) Regulations 2004 as follows:-
|
|
|
|
Prescribed Class C
Nil Discount
|
|
|
|
5
That it be noted that at its meeting on
28 February 1996 the Council resolved not to treat any expenses
incurred by the Council in part of its area or in meeting any levy
or special levy as special expenses and that the resolutions remain
in force until expressly rescinded.
|
|
|
|
6
That it be noted that at its meeting on
10 December 2007 the Executive calculated the following amounts for
the year 2008/09 in accordance with regulations made under Section
33(5) of the Local Government Finance Act 1992:-
|
|
|
|
a)
|
29,418.92 being the amount calculated by the Executive, in
accordance with regulation 3 of the Local Authorities (Calculation
of Council Tax Base) (Wales) Regulations 1995, as its council
tax base for the year.
|
|
|
b)
|
Part of the Council's area:
|
|
|
|
|
being the amounts calculated by the Council, in accordance
with regulation 6 of the Regulations, as the amounts of its council
tax base for the year for dwellings in those parts of its area to
which one or more special items relate.
|
|
|
|
|
7
That the following amounts be now
calculated by the Council for the year 2008/09 in
accordance with Sections 32 to 36 of the
Local Government Finance Act 1992:-
|
|
|
|
a)
|
£169,565,362.95
being the aggregate of the amounts which the
Council estimates for the items set out in Section 32(2)(a) to (d)
of the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
£ 54,974,108.00
being the aggregate of the amounts which the
Council estimates for the items set out in Section 32(3)(a)
and (c) of the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
£114,591,254.95
being the amount by which the aggregate at
7(a) above exceeds the aggregate at 7(b) above, calculated by the
Council, in accordance with Section 32(4) of the Act, as its budget
requirement for the year.
|
|
|
|
|
ch)
|
£ 91,249,162.00
being the aggregate of the sums which the
Council estimates will be payable for the year into its council
fund in respect of redistributed non-domestic rates and revenue
support grant reduced by any amount calculated in accordance with
Section 33(3B) of the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
d)
|
£
793.44 being the
amount at 7(c) above less the amount at 7(ch) above, all divided by
the amount at 6(a) above, calculated by the Executive, in
accordance with Section 33(1) of the Act, as the basic amount of
its council tax for the year.
|
|
|
|
|
dd)
|
£ 783,664.95
being the aggregate amount of all
special items referred to in Section 34(1) of the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
e)
|
£
766.80 being the
amount at 7(d) above less the result given by dividing the amount
at 7(dd) above by the amount at 6(a) above, calculated by the
Executive, in accordance with Section 34(2) of the Act, as the
basic amount of its council tax for the year for dwellings in those
parts of its area to which no special item relates.
|
|
|
|
|
f)
|
Part of the Council's area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llangristiolus a Cerrigceinwen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llanfair Mathafarn Eithaf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llangristiolus & Cherrigceinwen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llanfair Mathafarn Eithaf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Council's Area :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
DISCRETIONARY RATE RELIEF - REVIEW OF
POLICY
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Head of
Service (Finance) - That non-domestic properties (apart form
certain exemptions, such as properties associated with agriculture
or the disabled) were liable to payment of non domestic rates. A
system of reliefs had been partly designed to alleviate the burden
of taxation on occupiers other than business.
|
|
|
|
Local Authorities in Wales
must grant mandatory relief provided for within the Local
Government Finance Act 1888 (LGFA88). Under the Act local
authorities could also grant discretionary relief or remission from
rates up to 100% of the rates payable.
|
|
|
|
The cost of granting
discretionary relief was borne in part by the National Non-Domestic
Rates (NNDR) Pool (i.e. the National Assembly for Wales - NAfW) and
by the local council taxpayers.
|
|
|
|
The Council was required,
when exercising discretion, to consider each application for
discretionary relief on its merits. However, the Council had also
felt it reasonable to have criteria to help achieve some
consistency between cases. The Executive on 28th April 2003 adopted
policy guidelines which covered most foreseeable cases and resolved
that these policy guidelines for charitable and non-profit making
bodies should be adopted for five years i.e. up to 31 March, 2008.
These guidelines were adopted after a period of consultation with
relevant stakeholders.
|
|
|
|
The operation of the
policy guidelines adopted 5 years ago along with the relevant
delegated power to officers, had achieved the Executive’s aim
of consistency of interpretation and ease of administration. The
introduction of categories E(1) through to F(2) had allowed
officers to award relief without repeated recourse to the Executive
for decision. Indeed, the flexibility contained within categories
E(1) to F(2) had meant that Category G had not been used. (Details
of these categories were listed at Appendix ‘A’ of the
report to this Committee).
|
|
|
|
It would seem correct to
conclude therefore, that generally, the policy guidelines adopted
five years ago had been a success.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED that the
current policy guidelines be readopted for a further 5 years up to
31 March, 2013. In doing so, the Army and Air Cadet Associations be
added to the organisations listed in Category A(1).
|
|
|
|
7
|
REVIEW OF POLLING DISTRICTS, POLLING PLACES AND
POLLING STATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Portfolio
Holder for Corporate Governance - That the Electoral Administration
Act 2006, placed a duty on the Council to review all polling
districts and polling places by the end of 2007, and at least every
four years thereafter.
|
|
|
|
Local Authorities were
required to divide their areas into polling districts for the
purposes of parliamentary elections and to designate polling places
for those polling districts, and to keep these under
review.
|
|
|
|
The Review was undertaken
in two parts. The first stage involved officers visiting each site
to review the location, facilities and access for electors
including those with disabilities. This was undertaken during 2006.
Then during 2007 an extensive public consultation was undertaken
including electors, political parties and Medrwn Môn
requesting their opinions on the present polling districts, polling
places and polling stations. This included public and press notices
and direct mail to the town and community councils across the
county.
|
|
|
|
There were no
representations requesting a review of polling districts, polling
places or polling stations. Although site surveys identified
improvements required to some buildings these were generally being
addressed by their proprietor, usually the community councils, and
were not a reason to consider site relocation.
|
|
|
|
There were no
representations following the National Assembly of Wales elections
on the 3 May 2007 on the location of polling districts, polling
places or polling stations.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to note and
formally endorse the conclusion of the review as reported.
|
|
|
|
8
|
ISLE OF ANGLESEY LOCAL HOUSING STRATEGY
2007-2012
|
|
|
|
|
Reported - That the
Executive on 25th February, 2008 upon consideration of the
above Strategy had
resolved as follows:-
|
|
|
|
“To approve
and adopt the Ynys Môn Local Housing Strategy for 2007-2012
and the Operational Plan, subject to future approval of any cost
implications.”
|
|
|
|
“To ratify
the decision not to undertake a Strategic Environmental Assessment
of the Strategy.”
|
|
|
|
Councillor R. Ll. Hughes
enquired as to how many private housing grants the Council had
issued during the present financial year?
|
|
|
|
The Portfolio Holder in
reply stated that he would supply Councillor Hughes with a written
reply in this respect.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to endorse
the Executive’s decision in this respect.
|
|
|
|
9
|
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE AND WELLBEING STRATEGY
2008-11
|
|
|
|
|
Reported - That the
Executive on 25th February, 2008, upon consideration of a
report by the
Corporate Director (Housing & Social Services) on the above
Strategy, had resolved as follows:-
|
|
|
|
‘RESOLVED to
approve in principle the Health, Social Care and Wellbeing Strategy
2008-11 (subject to future approval of any cost implications) and
that it be submitted to the full County Council meeting on 4th
March, 2008, for formal adoption.’
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to endorse
the Executive’s decision in this respect.
|
|
|
|
10
|
SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCES
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted - The report of
the Head of Service (Planning) as submitted to the Executive on
25th February, 2008 with regard to the following
SPG’s:-
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
DESIGN GUIDE FOR THE URBAN AND RURAL
ENVIRONMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS (SECTION 106
AGREEMENTS)
|
|
|
|
|
Reported - That the
Executive on 25th February 2008, upon consideration of the above
SPG’s had resolved as follows:-
|
|
|
|
“to approve
the contents of the above Supplementary Planning Guidances and that
they be submitted to full Council for adoption with a
recommendation that they become operational as from 25th February,
2008.”
|
|
|
|
Councillor C. L. Everett
referred members to the SPG on Planning Obligations (Section 106
Agreements). He was of the opinion that officers should strengthen
the wording contained therein with regard to conditions imposed
upon developers, be they either private developers or the local
authority, with regard to the planning, upkeep / maintenance of
trees and shrubs, especially in public areas. He was aware of
problems encountered with regard to overgrown trees blocking the
use of CCTV cameras and leaves blocking storm drains,
etc.
|
|
|
|
The Portfolio Holder in
reply stated that he would ask the Department to take these views
on board.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to endorse
the Executive’s decision in this respect and that the
SPG’s become operational as from today’s date.
|
|
|
|
11
|
PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN FOR WALES - FINDING OF
MALADMINISTRATION
|
|
|
|
|
To consider a
recommendation made by the Public Service Ombudsman for Wales
following a finding of maladministration in respect of a planning
matter (Ombudsman case reference 200700051).
|
|
|
|
Submitted - A report by
the Head of Service (Planning) in consultation with the Managing
Director and the Monitoring Officer.
|
|
|
|
Councillor H. W. Thomas,
Portfolio Holder was of the opinion that the Council needed to take
serious stock of the contents of the report. He stated that
according to the Ombudsman’s internet site, Councils had 3
months in which to reply to such reports and that the Ombudsman
encouraged dialogue at all times.
|
|
|
|
He proposed that the
Leader should set up a meeting with the Ombudsmsn and that a
representative from each Political Group within the Council be
present together with the local member, in order to discuss its
contents and come to a sensible resolution regarding the way
forward. This was vitally important for the future of planning on
Anglesey.
|
|
|
|
The Director of Legal
Services / Monitoring Officer drew members attention to the Public
Services Ombudsman (Wales) Act 2005, under which this report by the
Ombudsman had been produced. Section 19(2) of the Act stated
“that the Authority must consider
the report and notify the Ombudsman before the end of the permitted
period of the action it has taken or proposes to take in response
to the report and the period before the end of which it proposes to
have taken that action.” It then
went on to say “that
permitted period is normally a period of one month beginning with
the date when the Council receives the report or any longer period
specified by the Ombudsman in writing.” The date of report was the 14th January. The period
specified by the Ombudsman in this case was not the usual month, it
was two months, and that was from the date of receipt and not from
the date of the report. That therefore made the statutory deadline
for the Council to reply, by 17th March, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, the Council
needed to reach a decision by the end of next week so that it met
the statutory deadline. The suggestion that there was a time to
have a meeting seemed unlikely in the circumstances, since that
meeting would have to take place and be followed by an
extraordinary meeting of the Council before the end of next
week.
|
|
|
|
Councillor H. W. Thomas
re-iterated the information that appeared on the Ombudsman’s
web site as regards timescales (3 months) and that the site
encouraged Authorities to discuss matters. He again proposed that
dialogue take place with the Ombudsman in this respect.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED that the
Director of Legal Services / Monitoring Officer be requested to
write to the Ombudsman as a matter of urgency with a view to making
arrangements for the Leader, one representative from each Political
Group and the local member to meet up with the Ombudsman with a
view to discussing the contents of his report.
|
|
|
|
12
|
NOTICE OF MOTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARA 4.1.13.1 OF
THE CONSTITUTION
|
|
|
|
|
1. The following Notices of Motion
had been submitted by Councillor R. Ll. Jones:-
|
|
|
|
“In view of
the continual need for primary schools to be looked at for possible
closures, could the Director of Education agree to look in depth at
the overheads that his department has at present.
|
|
|
|
What have other
local authorities done in order to reduce their overheads in areas
such as the administration of repair and maintenance - for example
what is the total spend we have and what is the administrative cost
of running this particular section.
|
|
|
|
What we
should be aiming for is to have local authority schools that are
the envy even of the private sector schools as is
the case on the continent of Europe.
|
|
|
|
Can we look now at
reducing our class sizes especially in areas of deprivation as it
is only by providing extra tuition that we can achieve our
goal of raising standards of education in these areas. Areas of
deprivation exist in the rural as well as the urban
areas of our
Island. Our assembly members must be given a clear signal that
education is our first priority and that extra resources are
desperately needed.”
|
|
|
|
In this context
Councillors A. M. Jones and E. Schofield requested the Leader not
to close any school on Anglesey until the rationalisation of
schools review had been finalised in its entirety on the
Island.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED that the
Corporate Director (Education & Leisure) be requested to report
back to the Executive on what savings the Department can achieve in
order to reduce educational overheads.
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
2. “Taking into consideration the success this
Council has achieved in being the first Council in the whole of
Wales to have all of its social housing now fitted with central
heating could we now embark on an ambitious programme of looking at
providing free school meals for all of our Primary School Children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At present it costs
£8.50 a week for school dinners - when we have families with
two or more children of primary school age we are talking about
£17.00 and in some cases I know of £25.50 a week for a
daily mid day meal. We know that some families qualify for free
school dinners and yet there are still a lot of decent hard working
families who cannot afford to pay these prices. Let us try to erase the stigma of
differentiating between children and making them feel that they are
obtaining a hand out because they are poor and go forward to show
the whole of Wales that we can make a difference to the quality of
life for our children. The
Assembly has seen fit to give us free medicine they should now look
at the provision of a mid day meal for our children as being
equally important to the future healthy development of our next
generation.
|
|
|
|
I move that we act
as a Council and take this up with the Assembly Government as soon
as possible, the falling school numbers should go a long way
towards funding such a provision.”
|
|
|
|
Councillor J. M. Davies,
Portfolio Holder, supported the Notice and stated that this was
something that should be applied to the whole of Wales. If Anglesey
proceeded on its own in this respect it would cost this Authority
£900k p.a. Newport Council had considered this as a pilot
scheme but the costs were excessive and they supported the
principle that it should be applied to the whole of
Wales.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED that the
Corporate Director (Education & Leisure) be asked to write to
the Welsh Assembly Government requesting that they make the
necessary funds available in order to provide free schools meals to
all children throughout Wales without the need for a means
test.
|
|
|
|
2. The following
Notices of Motion had been submitted by Councillor J. A.
Jones:-
|
|
|
|
“That
Llangefni is included as a stand alone Main Centre, alongside
Holyhead and Amlwch in any plan, spatial or otherwise that is part
of the Council’s future Local Development
Plan.”
|
|
|
|
“That
Llangefni is not declared a Conservation Area but that certain
individual buildings may be considered for special protection after
consultation and with the agreement of the
owner(s).”
|
|
|
|
Councillor J. Arthur Jones
informed members that he was withdrawing the Notices of Motion as
they were to be considered at a public meeting to be called by
Llangefni Town Council in the near future.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to note the
position.
|
|
|
|
13
|
QUESTIONS RECEIVED PURSUANT TO RULE
4.1.12.4
|
|
|
|
|
The following questions
were put by Councillor Thomas Jones:-
|
|
|
|
To the Portfolio
Holder Economic Development.
|
|
|
|
1. What is the change in
the gross domestic product on Anglesey in the last four
years?
|
|
|
|
The Leader in reply
stated:-
“There are no figures for
G.D.P in Anglesey for the last three years. The latest figures
published by Eurostat were for 2005, with Anglesey’s GDP
being 64.6% of the EU average.”
|
|
|
|
The following
supplementary question was put by Councillor Thomas
Jones:-
|
|
|
|
“How are we
going to use the convergence fund in the future and what plans do
we have in the economic development section to use those resources
to increase the Island’s GDP?”
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Leader in reply
stated “that Anglesey and
Gwynedd had almost the lowest GDP in Europe. Convergence funds from
the Welsh Assembly were 15 months behind schedule. Salaries on
Anglesey were also the lowest in Wales. It was vital that
convergence funds be available to provide an opportunity for
youngsters to train for skilled posts. At present we had a quantum
of young people on Anglesey leaving school at 16 years of age with
no chance of employment and no confidence in their
future.”
|
|
|
|
2. What are the Economic
Development Department’s plans for making the best use of the
Rural Development Plan?
|
|
|
|
The Leader in reply
stated:- “If the Anglesey
Regeneration Partnership’s Rural Development Plan bid is
successful the Economic Development Unit will be implementing
schemes in the fields of tourism and coastal development valued at
£675,000 (over three years). The Unit, with the Finance
Department, will also be responsible for managing and supervising
the whole Scheme locally on behalf of the Anglesey Economic
Regeneration Partnership and the Wales Assembly Government. The
result of the bid is expected in June.”
|
|
|
|
Councillor T. Jones
requested that once this package was in place that a session be
held between the members of the Council and the Economic
Development Department so that all the members are updated of the
latest position.
|
|
|
|
The Leader in reply stated
that he was prepared to accede to such request.
|
|
|
|
The Chair upon closing the
meeting expressed his best wishes and thanks to those members who
did not intend to contest the May elections. Best wishes were also
extended to those members should there be an election in their
Ward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The meeting concluded at 4:40pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
COUNCILLOR W.J.WILLIAMS, MBE
|
|
CHAIR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|