|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council had complied with financial and performance
improvement reporting requirements, but the next 12 months were
critical for the Council to improve it’s arrangements to
secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness in its use of
resources.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council had appropriate arrangements to administrate
and report financial matters but did not have appropriate
arrangements to secure value for money in its use of resources in
2008/09.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Statement of Accounts 2008/09 was prepared in
accordance with statutory requirements and presented fairly the
financial position and transactions of the Council.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council did not have appropriate arrangements in place
to secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness in its use of
resources in 2008-09.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council’s Improvement Plan 2009-10 met statutory
requirements and provided a balanced view of its performance in
2008-09 but data demonstrated that performance against targets had
declined slightly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Relationship Manager had concluded that:-
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Review of services and corporate arrangements indicated
that the Council needed to address any significant weaknesses and
had a poor record in responding to the recommendations of external
regulators.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council’s long history of not being properly run
had a corrosive effect on the exercise of its functions and left it
poorly placed to meet future challenges.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council recognised that there was considerable room
for improvement in its asset Management arrangements but progress
was beginning to be made.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
The Council had made limited progress in implementing many
previous recommendations but was strengthening its arrangements for
monitoring the response to Wales Audit Office reports.
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Reviews undertaken by the Care and Social Services
Inspectorate Wales had identified a number of areas of
concern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members were afforded the opportunity of raising questions
on the contents of the annual letter. The Leader thanked the
representatives of the Wales Audit Office and PWC for their
presence today and looked forward to them presenting their report
to the County Council on 4th March, 2010. He also stated that
because of what had been recently raised at the Audit Committee as
regards the assessment of proper arrangements for securing value
for money, that the Executive would take those views on board and
respond to the Audit Committee as soon as practicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to accept the contents of the report and to
also note that the Executive would report back to the Audit
Committee as soon as practicably possible with regard to the
assessment of proper arrangements for securing value for money as
referred to in the Auditor’s annual letter.
|
|
|
|
|
4. MINUTES FOR INFORMATION-LOCAL SERVICE
BOARD.
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted for information- The minutes of the meeting of
the Local Service Board held on 15th December, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to note the
contents of the minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. MATTER REFERRED TO THE EXECUTIVE FROM THE
PRINCIPAL SCRUTINY
|
|
COMMITTEE - FLEET
MANAGEMENT.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported- That the Principal Scrutiny Committee at
it’s meeting on 3rd December, 2009 had resolved as
follows:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
“To request the Executive to look at Fleet
Management across the Council’s departments, with the
recommendation that it reconsiders the level of risk which this
matter represents and includes it as one of the recognised risks to
the Council.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Head of Service (Highways and Waste
Management) - That the need for a Fleet and Driver Management
Policy and Procedures arose from an audit by Pricewaterhouse
Coopers on behalf of the Welsh Audit Office and the
subsequent report, Fleet Management Isle of Anglesey County
Council, which was published in July 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The policy before the Executive today (Appendix 1)
established the principles for fleet management within the County
Council and explained the role of the fleet in supporting the
Council’s corporate aims. A synopsis of the roles and
responsibilities which arose from best practice in fleet management
was provided in Appendix 2 and these would be incorporated into the
procedures referred to at Paragraph 3.2 of the report.It was
intended to review the Policy and procedures within three years of
publication, but in the meantime it would be necessary to regularly
review them in order to ensure that they confirmed with any
legislative changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Interim Managing Director referred Members to Para 3.2
of Appendix1 of the report which stated that the Fleet and Driver
Management Team would have overall management and deployment
responsibility for the Authority’s vehicle fleet. An
additional recommendation (4.3) had been added to the report. The
Interim Managing Director felt that it was possible, not only to
respond to the issues of risk, but also in terms of issues of cost
by greater centralisation. It was important to make it clear what
was meant by management and deployment, i.e. taking decisions about
the replacement of vehicles, the times they were replaced, the
vehicles used, making sure that the DLO was efficient in terms of
its maintenance workshop, etc.After today’s discussion, he
would be making Directorates aware of what exactly that meant in
terms of centralising aspects of control and management to improve
proactivity and efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To accept the Fleet Management Policy as the official
policy of the Council and that the Fleet and Driver Manager be
authorised to act in accordance with this Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
That the Head of Service (Highways and
Waste Management) be requested to report back to the Executive with
a 6 month progress report on the development of fleet
management.
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the Fleet and Driver Manager, following
consultation with the Head of Service (Highways and Waste
Management) be given delegated authority to make changes to the
Policy and Procedures as is necessary in order to ensure that they
are kept up to date and comply with legislation, relevant national
regulations and best practice.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the Fleet and Driver Manager, together with the
Head of Service (Highways and Waste Management) takes full control
of the management of the Council’s vehicle fleet , in order
to maximise efficiency savings and reduce running costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. RESIDENTIAL HOMES REFURBISHMENT.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported - That this Council currently owned and managed 6
residential care homes for older people. Five of these were purpose
built units and the sixth was an adapted older property. The homes
were located across the island and offered 165 residential
beds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the last quarter of 2009, the Director of Social
Services visited all 6 residential homes and was extremely
concerned at the condition of some of the buildings and the quality
of the rooms and facilities available to residents(details provided
within the report).The Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales
had identified the need to refurbish and redecorate some rooms in
all of the Council’s care homes.The Authority by not taking
action was leaving itself open to possible prosecution and closure
of one or more of the non compliant care homes.The residential
homes required considerable investment to ensure that they met the
standards as defined in legislation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 3 options which the Authority was able to
consider and these were listed at Paragraph 4 of this report.
Although all three were viable, Options 1 and 2 would not attend to
the immediate challenge that faced the Authority. Investment was
required across the group of 6 homes so that a standard of care
could be offered to current and future residents that preserved
their dignity and enabled them to enjoy the quality of life they
deserved .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members enquired as to the covenant in place with regard
to Haulfre residential home and asked officers to investigate the
matter further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Director(Finance) reminded members that a
decision was still required as regards the indicative budget of
£600k set aside within the Capital Plan to finance a
programme of upgrade and the provision of en-suite bathrooms at
some of the homes. If this was not decided upon then the Executive
may not be conforming with the budgetary policy of the Council as
adopted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following lengthy discussion on the matter,some of the
Members felt that the matter should be deferred for a month,pending
the receipt of further information from the Social Services and
Property Departments as to what was achievable,including a planned
maintenance scheme for the homes in question. Other Members
considered that Option 2 should be pursued. The matter was put to
the vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Interim Managing Director stated that prior to
preparing a comprehensive strategy for its homes, the Council had
to analyse the problems it faced.The Council had to understand the
level of private sector provision, the competitive market it was
working in, whether investing money would increase capacity, the
impact of planning policies particularly extra care housing,
Government proposals as regards the funding of care, the
Council’s own backlog maintenance, design and remodelling
costs.To expect a comprehensive report on all these matters within
the timescale proposed was not feasible and Members should not to
raise their expectations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To defer consideration to enable the Acting Corporate
Director (Housing and Social Services) and the Head of Service
(Property) to provide within a month’s time, a further
detailed report on the options presented to this Committee in
consultation with the relevant Portfolio Holders.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the Acting Corporate Director (Housing and
Social Services) also be requested to report back to that meeting
following consultation with the Director of Legal
Services/Monitoring Officer as regards any covenants relating to
Haulfre residential home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. COMPENSATION AND EX-GRATIA
PAYMENTS.
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted for information- The 7th quarterly report of the
Solicitor to the Monitoring Officer on claims/complaints by means
of payments of compensation including ex-gratia payments for the
period September to November 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to note the contents of the
report.
|
|
|
|
|
8. REVIEW OF CORPORATE COMPLAINTS AND
COMPLIMENTS PROCEDURE.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Solicitor to Monitoring Officer- That the
new Corporate Complaints and Compliments procedure was introduced
on 1st June 2009. and the County Council on 5th May 2009 resolved
“that the procedure be
monitored by the Executive in 6 months time”.
Attached was a Report on the pilot period of
the new Procedure for the period 1st June to 30th
November,2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Public Services Ombudsman for Wales was chairing a
working group looking at a common system for public services in
Wales. A consultation paper was expected early in 2010. It
was suggested that the new procedure remained in place and
continued for a further period until the Ombudsman’s
consultation was concluded and that matters be considered further
at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Ieuan Williams requested that monthly graphs on
response times should be made available as soon as possible on the
Council web site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the current Corporate Complaints and Compliments
Procedure continues for a further period until the
Ombudsman’s consultation is concluded and that the whole
matter of complaints is considered further at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the Solicitor to the Monitoring Officer be
requested to introduce as soon as possible the listing of
complaints data on the Council website with regard to response
times.
|
|
|
|
|
9. ROADS INSPECTION POLICY
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Head of Service (Highways and Waste
Management) - That the Service was preparing a Highway Asset
Management Plan (HAMP) and as part of this work it became apparent
that the existing Highway Inspection Policy needed to be reviewed
in order to comply with changes to the “Well-maintained Highways - Code of Practice
for Highway Maintenance.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
To ensure that a common standard was adopted throughout
the County Council, highways were to be inspected to the
frequencies defined in Table 1 of this report, whilst footways were
to be inspected as defined in Table 2 of the report.An Inspection
Register was to be maintained and updated regularly.Noted defects
were to be made within prescribed time scales in Table 3 of this
report.Amendments to the Policy were vital in order that the
Council could conduct robust defences to claims against the
Authority relating to defective highway components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To accept the new Highway Inspections
Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To agree that the Head of Service (Highways and Waste
Management) be given delegated authority to amend the Winter
Maintenance Policy for 2010/11 to conform to the amended Highways
Inspection Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To express this Committee’s appreciation to the
Highways Service for their work in gritting the highways during the
recent spell of inclement weather.
|
|
|
|
|
10. SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE - LIGHTING DESIGN
AND ACCESS
|
|
STATEMENTS.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Head of Service (Planning) - That both
SPGs had been subject to a period of formal consultation between
1st September to 20th October, 2009.The comments and proposed
changes had been considered and appropriate alterations had been
made to both documents, attached to this report.The proposed
changes were included in the appendix,along with details of whether
they had been implemented in the revised versions of both
documents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to recommend to the County Council that it
adopts the two Design Guides as part of the Urban and Rural
Environment S.P.G.
|
|
|
|
|
11. LEISURE STRATEGY
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted for information - An update by the Corporate
Director (Education and Leisure) on the draft 5 year Leisure
Services Strategy and the comprehensive report on the indoor
facilities provision required by the Executive for January
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers of the Service were currently up-dating the draft
strategy to reflect recent changes in the allocation of
expenditure, to carry out essential repairs to the Centres, and to
reflect the difficulties ahead in accessing resources in the
economic downturn. A Task and Finish Group of members and officers
had been established and it was intended to report back on its
progress to the Executive within 6 months time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Interim Managing Director stated that 3 different Task
and Finish Groups had been established across the Council and he
felt that their work should be made known to the general public via
the Communications Officer with regard to their running costs.This
would get the right message out to the general public before the
Council reached any final decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to accept the contents of the report and to
also note that a further progress report would be submitted to the
Executive in 6 months time on the progression of the
strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
12. SCHOOLS REVISED FUNDING FORMULA
(2010-11)
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by the Corporate Director (Education and
Leisure)- That in order to meet the requirements of the Education
Act, all Education Authorities were required to devise a formula to
allocate funding to all of its schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The core of the formula currently being used in Ynys
Môn was identical to the formula that was devised in the
early 1990’s. Work was started in 2008 by a small task-group
on revising the current formula. It was made clear to that group
from the outset, that a new formula would not lead to higher levels
of expenditure - the funding levels would remain unchanged.This
principle accounted for the fact that, in implementing a new
Formula, there would be ‘winners’ and
‘losers’ among schools. Nevertheless, it was felt that
a new formula should not be based on such consideration, but rather
on new principles that were not reflected in the current formula.
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED
|
|
|
|
That the new
School’s funding formula as listed in the report be adopted
for the 2010-11 financial year.
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To implement a 5% ‘safety net’ principle
for both ‘winners’ and ‘losers’.
|
|
|
|
|
(Note: In 2009-10,
the new formula was used to provide all schools with a
‘parallel budget’. A small number of schools in the
categories of ‘losing’ or ‘gaining’ more
than 5%. In view of the fact that the ‘parallel budget’
was based on the September 2008 pupil numbers, the gaining or
losing was partly to do with the changes of date rather than the
new formula itself. The 2010-11 budget would be based upon
September 2009 pupil numbers, and ‘losers’ in one year
could become ‘winners’ the following year.
Consideration will be given to school balances if individual
schools will become ‘losers’ within the new
formula.)
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That the new formula be kept under constant
review.
|
|
|
|
|
13. NORTH WALES PHYSICAL REGENERATION / ANGLESEY
THREE TOWNS PROJECT.
|
|
|
|
Reported - That the North
Wales Physical Regeneration package was a EU Convergence project
led by WAG which covered urban regeneration works in the towns of
Rhyl, Colwyn Bay, Bangor, Caernarfon, Holyhead, Llangefni and
Amlwch. The total North Wales package was £37m over four
years. WAG was the lead body for applying for EU funding, and was
also providing its own funding. The four County Councils were
identified as the lead delivery bodies for their areas through
which funding would be channeled based on an agreed programme for
each County.
|
|
|
|
The following
proposals for Anglesey were included in
the approved project plan (detailed at Paragraph 2 of the report to
the Committee):-
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Amlwch Capital Works (£1,400k)
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Llangefni Capital Works (£1,850k)
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Holyhead Capital Works & Townscape Heritage Initiative
(£4,588k)
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Capital Project Management (£410k)
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Town Centre Management (£490k - Revenue)
|
|
|
|
|
The Anglesey component of the package was
£8.738m, being made up of funds that had been secured for
expenditure by this Council.The grant was available for years
2009/10 to 2012/13. ERDF grant had been awarded to WAG and was
being passed on to the County Council by them by tying the Council
in to the ERDF grant conditions.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To Approve the Anglesey Three Towns
programme.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To authorise acceptance of the Welsh Assembly
Government grant offer of £7,609,525, subject to approval by
the Director of Finance and Director of Legal Services.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To approve the inclusion of the programmed
expenditure in the Council’s capital plan and capital revenue
budgets.
|
|
|
|
|
(Councillor Aled
Morris Jones declared an interest in the matter, remained at the
meeting but did not take part in any discussion or voting
thereon).
|
|
|
|
14. TOURISM STRATEGY NORTH WALES.
|
|
|
|
Reported - That the
Tourism Strategy North Wales 2010-2015, led by Tourism Partnership
North Wales had been compiled collaboratively, with contributions
from over 200 Tourism Trade businesses,10 Trade Fora and Marketing
Area Partnerships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Strategy itself was
welcomed by Officers who have had a significant role to play in its
formulation, both directly and through representation on the
Tourism Partnership. The Strategy promoted a way forward regarding
Tourism which was fully in accord with current and emerging
promotion and product development activities on the Island. A
number of the key objectives were apparent in the current Anglesey
Tourism Plan 2007-2010 which the Executive had approved.
|
|
|
|
Given its complementarity
with local strategy and policy, it was proposed that this regional
Strategy be used as the basis for the development of the management
and marketing of Tourism on Anglesey post 2010, when the current
Anglesey Tourism Action Plan would have expired.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To endorse and adopt the Tourism Strategy North Wales
2010-2015 as the collaborate way forward for the development of
Tourism on Anglesey.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
That a review of the Anglesey Tourism Action Plan be
carried out post 2010, using this Strategy as the basis.
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
To adopt a co-ordinated approach to the
implementation of those actions identified within the Strategy
Action Plan as being led by local authorities.
|
|
|
|
|
15. EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED that under
Section 100 (A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, to exclude
the press and public from the meeting
during discussion on the following item as it involves
the likely disclosure of exempt
information as defined in Scheduled 12A of said Act and in
the attached Public Interest
Test.
|
|
|
|
16. LLAINGOCH PLAYING FIELD - PROPOSED LEASE TO THE
HOLYHEAD TOWN COUNCIL.
|
|
|