Issue - meetings

11.1 – MAH/2022/1 – 37 Penlon, Menai Bridge

https://ioacc.force.com/s/papplication/a1G4H00000QcyTuUAJ/mah20221?language=en_GB

11.1  MAH/2022/1 – Minor amendments to scheme previously approved under planning permission HHP/2021/315 (Alterations and Extensions) so as to amend design of proposal at 37 Penlon, Menai Bridge

It was RESOLVED to approve the application in accordance with the Officer’s recommendation subject to the conditions contained within the written report.

11.1      MAH/2022/1 – Minor amendments to scheme previously approved under planning permission HHP/2021/315 (Alterations and Extensions) so as to amend design of proposal at 37 Penlon, Menai Bridge

(Having declared a personal and prejudicial interest with regard to the application, Councillor Robin Williams withdrew from the meeting during the discussion and determination thereof).

The application was presented to the Planning and Orders Committee as the applicant is a ‘relevant officer’ as defined within paragraph 4.6.10 of the Constitution.    The application has been scrutinised by the Monitoring Officer as required under paragraph 4.6.10.4 of the Constitution.

The Planning Development Manager reported that the application is for minor amendments to the previously approved scheme under planning permission HHP/2021/315.  The amendments that are proposed are to change the glazing appearance of the two French doors on the South elevation; remove existing kitchen door and block up instead of replacing with full height glazing and making the existing window smaller, now in the lounge, reduce the size of the proposed lantern and change the proposed bio-fold doors to sliding doors.  The amendments are considered to be non-material amendments and the scale of the proposed change would not cause an impact different to that caused by the original approval.  The proposal would not result in a detrimental impact visually or in terms of local amenity, no third party would be disadvantaged and the proposal would not conflict with national and development plan policies.  The application is deemed to be non-material and therefore approved under Section 96A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.  The recommendation is of approval of the application, and to authorise the Head of Service to add to, remove or amend/vary any condition(s) before the issuing of the planning permission.

Councillor John Griffith proposed that the application be approved and Councillor K P Hughes seconded the proposal of approval.

It was RESOLVED to approve the application in accordance with the Officer’s recommendation subject to the conditions contained within the written report.