|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason for refusal was given as the adverse
impact the alterations would have on a Conservation
Area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 SITE VISITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minutes of the Site Visits meeting held on 19th August
2009 were submitted and confirmed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No deferred applications included as part of the Agenda
for the meeting.
|
|
|
|
6 APPLICATIONS ARISING ON THE
MINUTES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
12C393 - Outline application for the erection of a
dwelling and garage together with the
construction of a new vehicular access on land opposite Garth Wen,
Llanfaes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This application was submitted to the Planning and Orders
Committee meeting held on 29th July 2009, when Members
resolved to visit the site. The site visit subsequently took place
on 19th August 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Planning Control Manager reported that the single
track county highway giving access to the site has poor horizontal
and vertical alignment, resulting in restricted forward visibility.
There are also insufficient passing bays along the length of
the road to enable the free flow of two way traffic, the additional
traffic that would be generated by the proposal would exacerbate
the current situation to the detriment of highway safety.
Also the removal of a hedgerow as part of the development
would make the proposal more visible, adding to its detriment
affect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Local Member, Councillor R.L. Owen reported that the
road passing this site is been used by the 28 houses at Garth Wen
estate. The road was used during the last century to an
important military camp; the old Denbighshire and Anglesey Yeomanry
used to meet there aswell. The applicant is willing to
decrease the height of a hedge for added visibility to the proposed
site. He requested the Committee to approved the
application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Lewis Davies noted that the visibility is
sub-standard, with not enough passing areas on the lane. The
widening of the lane would have a detrimental effect on a
historical country road from the Priory in Penmon to Llanfaes;
there is rare vegetation on this road. He further noted that
the Committee should be consistent with its decisions as two
planning applications have been refused previously in this area.
Councillor Davies proposed that the Officer’s
recommendation of refusal be supported. Councillor W.J.
Chorlton seconded the proposal of refusal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor T.H. Jones noted that if a Section 106
agreement would be signed, with no further development be allowed
on this land; he could support the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The voting was as follows :-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To accept the Officer’s report and to refuse the
application : Councillors W.J. Chorlton, Lewis Davies,
Kenneth P. Hughes, H. W. Thomas, J.P. Williams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To approve the application contrary to the Officer’s
recommendation : Councillors Barrie Durkin, Jim Evans, O. Glyn
Jones, T.H. Jones, R.L. Owen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was refused on the casting vote of the
Chairman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendation of refusal in respect of this
application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor E.G. Davies asked it be noted that he abstained
from voting on this application, as he was not present at the
beginning of the deliberations of the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 20C250 -
Alterations and extensions to Thalassa, Ffordd y Traeth,
Cemaes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was noted that the application had been
withdrawn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 20C251 -
Alterations and extensions to Swn yr Afon, Ffordd y Traeth,
Cemaes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was noted that the application had been
withdrawn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
30C83E - Demolition of the existing building and erection of a new
building comprising
|
|
|
of a play
room, office, reception, fitness room, games room and store at
Dolydd, Pentraeth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor J.P. Williams noted that he had declared
an interest in respect of the above application. He was a member of
an organisation on the Island; around 20 years ago, and one of the
objectors was the Secretary. He noted that he has had no
contact with the objector since then. The Legal Service
Manager noted that did not appear to be a close personal
relatiionship to constitute a declaration of interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor B. Durkin declared an interest in
respect of this application. He took part in the
deliberations but abstained from voting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This application was brought for determination by the
Committee at the request of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Member, Councillor Barrie Durkin. At the meeting of
the Committee held on 29th July 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
it had been resolved that the site be visited. That site
visit took place on 19th August 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Planning Control Manager reported that the site is in
close proximity to the property called Meillion. The
submitted plans show that the building will be between 2m and 2.8m
higher than the hedge near the property. The size and use of
the proposed building will have a significant impact on the
amenities of the occupiers of Meillion by virtue of the increase in
activity and disturbance created by visitors to the building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Local Member, Councillor B. Durkin noted that this is
a well run tourist establishment. The proposal to demolish a
redundant building, which is only used for storage. He noted
that he considered that the objections in the Officer’s
report do not fit in with the requirements. It says that
‘the building is excessive
in size, scale and massing’;
Councillor Durkin does not agree with this statement. He
considered that the roof of the proposed building will only be
slightly higher than the hedge; and was of the opinion that the
neighbouring property is quite elevated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He stressed that the tourist industry should be supported
and considered that the application should be approved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas also noted that he does not agree
with the reasons for refusal of the application by the Officers.
He noted that the report states ‘the application site is in close proximity to the
property Meillion. It will be positioned approximately 2m
from that property’s boundary’; he considered that the property Meillion is a further 25
yards away from the proposed application site. He stressed
that consistency is required when dealing with application and
stated that at a previous meeting Officer’s recommended
approval of a dwelling in Benllech which was only a few yards away
from a neighbouring property. He considered that full support
should be given to the tourist industry on the Island and strongly
proposed that the application be approved. Councillor R.L.
Owen seconded the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to
approve the application, contrary to the Officer’s
recommendation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reasons for approving the application were
:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The size of the building is not considered excessive in
size and mass
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overlooking is not an issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two storey building exist at present near the
proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrading a tourist facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the Council’s Constitution,
the application was automatically deferred to the next meeting to
allow Officers the opportunity to prepare a report on the reason
for approving the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillors Barrie Durkin did not vote in respect of this
item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor J.P. Williams did not take part in the
discussion or voting in respect of this item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
Economic Applications submitted for determination by this
Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
APPLICATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Affordable Housing applications submitted for
determination by this Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
24C268B - Outline application for the erection of a
dwelling together with the construction of a new access and
installation of a new sewage treatment plant on land adjoining
Gwelfor, Cerrigman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Planning Control Manager reported that the application
is a departure from the development plan but one which the local
planning authority are minded to approve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application site is located in the countryside under
the provision of the adopted Ynys Môn Local Plan (December
1996), and has thus been advertised as a departure from the
development plan. This is due to Cerrigman not being listed
under the provisions of Policy 50 (Listed settlements) of this
plan, which permits single dwellings within or on the edge of the
listed villages and hamlets subject to the listed criteria being
satisfied. Cerrigman is included as a settlement under the
provisions of Policy HP5 of the Ynys Môn Unitary Development
Plan. This policy permits single dwellings on infill and
other acceptable sites subject to the listed criteria. The
application site is also located within the indicative frame.
In view of the advanced stage reached in the preparation of
the Stopped Ynys Môn Unitary Development Plan, weight can be
attributed to its provisions such as to outweigh the provisions of
the development plan in this instance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor W.J. Chorlton proposed that the application be
approved. Councillor J. Arwel Roberts seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendations to approve the application, subject to
conditions as outlined within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS SUBMITTED BY
COUNCILLORS AND/OR OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
31C240A - Erection of a conservatory at Bryntirion
Cottage, Lôn Pant, Llanfairpwll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Richard Eames, Development Control Officer
(Highways) declared an interest and left the meeting during the
discussion on this item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This application was submitted to the Committee as the
agent is a close friend of one of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers working within the Planning and Environment
Services Department of the County Council. The
Monitoring Officer had seen the file and confirmed that the
application was process in the usual manner and in accordance with
paragraph 4.6.10.4 of the Constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is adequate space within the curtilage of Bryntirion
Cottage to provide for the proposed conservatory without over
developing the site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor W.J. Chorlton proposed that the application be
approved. Councillor E.G. Davies seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendations to approve the application, subject to
conditions as outlined within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
34C597 - Extension to the existing conservatory,
conversion of garage into utility,
|
|
|
|
|
|
living room-bedroom and alterations to the existing
vehicular access at 2 Brig y Nant,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This application was submitted to the Committee as the
applicant is the husband of a County
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor. The Monitoring Officer had seen the file and
confirmed that the application was processed in the usual manner
and in accordance with paragraph 4.6.10.4 of the
Constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The work that is proposed would normally not require the
benefit of planning permission, however a Permitted Development
Restriction has been placed on the estate and hence the reason for
the planning application. The proposed works will not affect
any other property by virtue of overlooking/overshadowing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor W.J. Chorlton proposed that the application be
approved. Councillor T.H. Jones seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendations to approve the application, subject to
conditions as outlined within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
36C296 - Full application for the erection of a
dwelling and detached garage together
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the construction of a vehicular access on land
near Ty’n Gamdda, Llangristiolus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Steven Owen, Planning Officer declared an
interest in respect of this application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This application was submitted to the Committee as the
applicant is a close friend of one of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers working within the Planning Control Section of
the County Council. The Monitoring Officer had seen the file and
confirmed that the application was process in the usual manner and
in accordance with paragraph
4.6.10.4 of the Constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was noted that the application has been deferred
to allow the applicant to serve notice on the neighbouring property
due to the Highway Authority stipulating the requirement for a
wider visibility splay to the proposed dwelling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 REMAINDER OF APPLICATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
20C250A - Works to a tree in a Conservation Area at
Thalassa, Ffordd y Traeth,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was brought for determination by the
Committee at the request of the local member.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notice relates to a ‘crown lift’ of the
tree in order to improve its form and remove branches interfering
with the roof of the adjoining property. The local planning
authority has carried out an amenity evaluation of the tree and
advised that it has notable amenity in this location, which must be
balanced against its condition at the base. The Notice is for
works that will have no significant impact on either the form or
health of the tree, and it is not considered expedient to place a
Tree Preservation Order on the Tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Local Member, Councillor W.T. Hughes noted that the
tree is in a conservation area and he hoped that the ‘crown
lift’ will be carried out in a proper manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor B. Durkin noted that the condition of the base
of the tree is poor; he suggested maybe that the tree might have to
be removed. He considered that the Conservation Officer and
the Tree Surgeon be consulted in respect of this matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Lewis Davies noted that Sycamore Tree are not
protected; when the tree grows the roots will penatrate the rock
and expand; this could create a danger with the splitting of the
rocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Planning Control Manager reported that the application
is for the lower branches of the tree to be shaped and the only
reason why the application has been brought for determination by
the Committee is that it is within a Conservation Area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas proposed the approve the
application. Councillor W.J. Chorlton seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendation to approve the application, subject to
conditions as outlined within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
.......20C252A- Alterations and extensions to Ty
Lawr, Ffordd y Traeth, Cemaes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was brought for determination by the
Committee at the request of the Local Member.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current application was originally resubmitted with a
shallower and lower designed roof than the two storey rear
extension. Following the receipt of objections from the
Conservation Officer this was amended to the current proposal.
It was noted that when exercising planning powers in a
conservation area, planning authorities must pay particular
attention to the desirability of retaining or improving the
character or appearance of that area. The application site is
in a prominent position in relation to the Harbour and within the
Conservation Area. The single storey extension at the rear of
the property presently affords significant public views outwards
from the public highway. The loss of these public views from
within this part of the Conservation Area would unacceptably harm
the character and appearance of the area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Local Member, Councillor W.T. Hughes noted that the
report states that 9 letters of objection had been received in
respect of this application; he noted that the original application
attracted over 80 letters of objection and these still oppose this
development. He noted that strong objection to the
application exist in the village of Cemaes as the area is unique
and it is of utmost importance due to heritage and history of
Cemaes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas proposed that the application be
refused. Councillor W.J. Chorlton seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendation to refuse the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 - 34LPA164E/CC - Construction of a
hard surface yard at Ysgol Corn Hir, Llangefni.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was reported to the Planning Committee as
the application is on Council owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The yard will follow as near as possible the existing land
contours and will have a bitumen tarmacadam finish. A
comprehensive drainage design is provided with this application to
reduce any risk of flooding or significant increases in loading on
the surface drainage system. The proposed yard will measure
600 square metres. The propose yard will not have an impact
on any neighbouring properties and will comply with the Policies
listed within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor E.G. Davies proposed that the application be
approved. Councillor O. Glyn Jones seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendation to approve the application, subject to
conditions as outlined within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
34LPA914/CC/TPO - Reduction of 2 trees protected by a
Tree Preservation Order at
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Dingle Nature Reserve, Llangefni.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was reported to the Planning Committee as
the application is on Council owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application is for the reduction of branches of 2
sycamore trees protected by a Tree Preservation Order at the
Dingle, Llangefni. The Planning Service has no objection to
the proposed reduction of branches on 2 Sycamore trees on the
grounds that the works will not have any adverse amenity impact on
the Tree Preservation Order or any detrimental impact on the health
of the trees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor W.J. Chorlton proposed that the application be
approved. Councillor O. Glyn Jones seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to accept the Officer’s report
and recommendations to approve the application, subject to
conditions as outlined within the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
36LPA827A/CC - Erection of an agricultural shed for
the housing of livestock at
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bodhenlli, Cerrigceinwen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was brought to the Planning Committee as
the application has been submitted
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Property Section of the County Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was noted that the design, siting and external
appearance of the proposed agricultural building are considered to
be acceptable in this location.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas
proposed that the application be approved. Councillor W.J.
Chorlton seconded the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to
accept the Officer’s report and recommendations to approve
the application, subject to conditions as outlined within the
report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6
46C160K - Retrospective application for
engineering works to create hardstanding
|
|
|
areas and a road
through part of the site at Ddraenan Ddu, Penrhosfeilw,
Holyhead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application was
brought for determination by the Committee at the request of the
Local Member.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application is
submitted retrospectively in an effort to regularise unauthorised
engineering works undertaken within the confines of the site which
the agents confirm were required as part of their clients scheme
for the overall upgrading of the site. The site is located
within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was noted that the
Local Member, Councillor Eric Roberts has declared an interest in
respect of this application. Councillor G.O. Parry MBE to
whom the matter has been referred to requested that the Committee
should visit the site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor E.G. Davies
proposed that the site be visited. Councillor J.P. Williams
seconded the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to
visit the site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 DELEGATED APPLICATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted and accepted,
the report of the Head of Planning Services in respect of delegated
applications determined since the last meeting of this
Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 APPEALS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted and noted, for
information, copy of summary of decision by the Planning
Inspector
|
|
|
in respect of
Glorian Estate, Builder’s Yard, Amlwch - appeal
allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 OTHER MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
45C390 - Demolition of the existing
outbuilding together with the erection of a
|
|
|
detached annexe at
Gerallt, Llangaffo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Planning Control
Manager reported that the application was approved subject to the
signing of a Section 106 Agreement by the Committee held on 6 May,
2009. The terms of the Section 106 Agreement were as follows
:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The existing dwelling
and proposed annexe shall be retained as one unit;
|
|
|
(2) The annexe shall not
be let, leased or otherwise disposed of until such a time as a
planning permission
incorporating necessary highway improvement works has been obtained
and
implemented. The written agreement of the local planning
authority shall be obtained to
confirm implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The applicants have
confirmed in writing on 21 July, 2009 that they are not willing to
sign the Section 106 Agreement. In the absence of a Section
106 agreement the proposal is not considered acceptable as the
increase in the use of the access would have an affect on highway
safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas
noted that the applicant is willing to retain both dwelling as one
unit; he noted that the applicant wishes to be able to let the unit
in the future. The Planning Control Manager reported that
highway safety is the problem with this application as it is
considered dangerous as vehicles exiting the property have to be in
the middle of the road to see oncoming traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor W.J. Chorlton
noted that common sense is required; the main property is a large
dwelling with the potential of many cars being used by the resident
of Gerallt. The applicant only wishes to let the unit in due
course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor E.G. Davies
stated that he was concerned that the access from the site is
dangerous and proposed that the application be refused. Councillor
O. Glyn Jones seconded the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas
proposed that the application be approved contrary to the
Officer’s report. Councillor W.J. Chorlton seconded the
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The voting was as follows
:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
To approve the
application, contrary to the Officer’s report :
Councillors W.J. Chorlton,
|
|
|
R.L. Owen, H.W. Thomas.
Total 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
To accept the
Officer’s report and to refuse the application :
Councillors E.G. Davies,
|
|
|
Lewis Davies, Barrie
Durkin, Jim Evans, Kenneth P. Hughes, O. Glyn Jones, T.H.
Jones,
|
|
|
J. Arwel
Roberts.
Total 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was RESOLVED to
accept the Officer’s report and recommendation of refusal in
respect of the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor J.P. Williams
requested that it be noted that he abstained from voting on this
application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2
Corporate Governance Inspection Report,
Wales Audit Office - Update on Response
|
|
|
to Recommendation
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted - report by the
Head of Planning Services in response to the Corporate Governance
Inspection Report dated July, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Head of Development
Control reported that the Wales Audit Office Report published on 15
July, 2009 recommended :-
|
|
|
|
|
|
“R4. Recent
changes to the decision making processes have contributed to
improving planning decisions. Nevertheless, Planning
Committee decisions remain a source of reputational damage and
erosion of public confidence. The Council, within three
months of the publication of this report, should make proposals for
increasing the transparency and quality of decision
making.”
|
|
|
The evidence for this is
based on the response to a public consultation exercise undertaken
by the Wales Audit Office. The Report states at paragraph 35
:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Some 70
members of the public contributed to our evidence. All were
critical of aspects of the Council’s work with planning
decisions emerging as the single biggest source of reputational
damage and erosion of public confidence. The Council has made
improvements to the decision making process in planning. But
for those who contacted us, historical and on-going concerns remain
over the transparency and quality of decision
making.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
At a meeting on 16 July,
2009, when the Wales Audit Office presented its findings to the
Council, WAO agreed to provide further details of what respondents
had said and to discuss proposals for improvements. In view
of the fact that ‘proposals for increasing the transparency
and quality of decision making’ as required by 15 October,
2009, the Head of Service also wrote to WAO on 27 July, 2009 and
included an Improvement Plan recently agreed with key stakeholders
in the Ynys Môn Planning Forum. To date, no response
has been received.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussions have also
taken place with the Welsh Assembly Planning Division to ensure
that Ministerial perceptions of Planning in Ynys Môn are
based on sound evidence. It is a pity that the WAO
recommendation appears to be derived from relatively superficial
evidence, particularly in view of the work around several external
audit reports on the Planning Committee and acted upon by the
Council over the last 2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor T.H. Jones
noted that during his office as Chairman of this Committee he
recalled that a number of training session had been arranged for
the Members. He noted that these training session were well
attended by the Members of the Planning and Orders Committee.
He suggested that it would be appropriate to produce a list
of the various training sessions held since May 2008 along with a
number of members attending each session. He considered that
some of the criticism is unfair in the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor H.W. Thomas
noted that he considered that the report is ‘one-sided’
i.e. criticism on the Committee. He questioned that the
County Council in 2007 resolved to delegate departure applications
to Officers; he stated that a Panel was also established to monitor
the decisions of the Officers in respect of departure application.
This Panel was delayed until after the May 2008 County
Council elections with an undertaking that the Panel would meet.
He questioned if the recommendation that Members are unable
to ‘call-in’ a departure application is still adhered
to. If the Council is arranging training sessions then all
the matter discussed at the County Council meeting in 2007 should
be considered fully to clear any discrepancies contained in the WAO
report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Head of Development
Control responded that 70 persons have written to the WAO
criticising the planning process; that is why the Council have
requested WAO for evidence of the core of the problem. He
noted that he has arranged a number of training sessions over the
years and was happy to produce a list of training sessions arranged
and the number of members attending since May 2008. He
referred that the Panel established to monitor decisions by
Officers in respect of departure applications had difficulties due
to political problems as to how that panel would operate. The
Officer’s within the department had met to review decisions.
He stressed that the Planning Service has lost members of
staff recently to other organisations and the budget of the service
has been decreased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor B. Durkin noted
that he agreed in principal to the statement made by the WAO;
however he noted that only a very small minority of Councillors
brought the planning service in serious distribute. It was
very unfair to ‘tar’ all Members of the Planning
Committee, at the time, going back over 5 years, with the same
brush. He referred to the WAO which states
“on-going concerns remain over
the transparency and quality of decision making”;
Councillor Durkin disagreed with this
statement as the Planning and Orders Committee is open to the
public and everyone is allowed to hear the debate and decisions
taken by the meeting. He considered that there has been a
drastic change in the attitude appertaining to planning matters and
to the decisions made by this Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor J.P. Williams
wished it to be recorded his appreciation to the Officer’s
for arranging numerous training session for this Committee; the
presentations has been good and has covered all the concerned
raised by Members to the planning process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor W.J. Chorlton
stated that there were problems within the Planning Committee
regarding block voting in previous years. He noted that the
Committee has drastically changed with a lot of new Members on the
Committee. Councillor Chorlton stated that he appreciated the
training sessions afforded to Members but would like to see more
emphasis being made on the ‘policy issues’ of the
planning process and how to conduct an appeal etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Head of Development
Control noted that the WAO has acknowledge that there has been an
improvement in the decision making within the Planning and Orders
Committee; maybe it is unfair that they have gone back over 5
years. He noted that there has been improvement in the
system over the last 2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chairman stated that
he considered that the Committee is having good debates and very
good quality comments are made. He thanked the Officers as he
considered that they have always been professional and ready to
help at all times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
to adhere to the timetable for introducing public
speaking in the Planning and Orders Committee by the New
Year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Continue to undertake an annual Planning Committee
review of decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Continue with training for Members by way of Seminars
etc., in line with the terms of the Planning Matters Procedure
Rules as contained within the Constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Review planning appellation processes to improve the
quality of decision-making.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Relaunch the Local Development Plan (LDP) to reflect
recent developments with Wylfa and moves to provide community
leadership through the ‘Ynys Ynni/Energy Island’
vision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Use the existing central LDP budget to appoint an LDP
Team Leader on a fixed term contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ÿ
|
Use funding associated with ‘Ynys Ynni/Energy
Island’ to help fill evidence gaps in the LDP and achieve the
LDP timetable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 ADDITIONAL ITEM SUBMITTED WITH THE
CHAIRMAN’S CONSENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1
Regular Review of Decisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Head of Development
Control reported that under the terms of the Constitution,
Members should
visit a sample of implemented planning permissions to assess the
quality of the decision.
|
|
|
Such a review should improve the
quality and consistency of decision making, thereby
|
|
|
strengthening public confidence and
assist with reviews of planning policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The review should include
examples from ranges of categories of development
including
|
|
|
applications which officers have
determined under delegated powers. Rather than
allocating
|
|
|
one day in the annual
calendar to conduct the visits, Officers recommended that such
examples of built development be included
as part of the normal cycle of monthly site visits by Members. It
was
|
|
|
anticipated that the review should be
completed over a period of two months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED to accept
the report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The meeting commenced at
1.00 p.m. and was drawn to a close at 2.20 p.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COUNCILLOR
KENNETH P.HUGHES
|
|
|
CHAIRPERSON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|